Can you give me your source for this ‘fact’? For any of your ‘facts’?
I don’t have any source, but look at vocoflex and voicepeak : did they get any notable update? no.
I have seen this similar scheme many time to believe InsX is gonna get left aside.
Maybe insX won’t be forsaken for awhile because if fixed properly it does have value, if only the reduction in space needed for lg libraries and the sound is realistic. However I can’t make sense of how dreamtonics does business; eg. Poor website upkeep, meaning no up to date info on site or blog, the way the links around seem disjointed , the long term neglect of UI and edit functionality (SV2) that carried over to insX, but in my opinion is a little worse, among other minor things. For instance in sv when in DAW, dragging a midi file to sv always forces a new track to be made, which seems cool, but if you have a singer/instrument track(s) loaded already it is annoying having to drag next midi track up to already loaded track and then delete that new empty one. Doing that over and over is pointless.
They’ve been around long enough to know that dockable panels are expected in modern software. These are my opinions though
So much potential wasted, although I hear they are a small team though, so maybe that a factor.